Skip to content
Cabine/Guides

RSI vs On-site Interpreting

Remote platforms save money but introduce latency and single points of failure. Here is when to use RSI and when to insist on physical booths.

Remote Simultaneous Interpretation (RSI) replaces on-site booths with cloud platforms, allowing interpreters to work from home studios or remote hubs. While it removes booth rental and travel costs, it introduces severe latency and connectivity risks that must be managed.

The economic argument for RSI

Flying a team of six interpreters to a hotel, paying their per diems, and renting three ISO-4043 mobile booths is expensive. RSI eliminates these lines from the budget. For short board meetings or webinars, RSI platforms (like Zoom or specialized hubs) make interpreting economically viable where it previously wasn't.

The operational risks

RSI shifts the burden of infrastructure from the AV provider to the open internet and the interpreter's local ISP.

The hybrid nightmare: The most failure-prone setup is a hybrid event where some speakers are in the room, some are on Zoom, and the interpreters are remote. If the venue's audio patching is not configured perfectly with mix-minus feeds, severe echo loops will destroy the interpretation.

When to insist on on-site booths

If your event is a high-stakes diplomatic summit, a shareholder general meeting, or a multi-day conference where failure is not an option, pay for the on-site booths. Hardwired AV infrastructure and physical presence guarantee a level of reliability that the open internet cannot match.

Price this in about a minute

The free calculator turns languages, days and delegate count into booths, teams, equipment and a total. Every rate editable, no signup.

Open the calculator